No More Referral Codes
By Art Hanson on September 21st, 2009 | Tags: bracelet argent strass 1braceletpascher338, combien coute un collier en or 720collierpascher1264, coque 3d samsung galaxy a5 marvel 709pascher11695, coque custodia cover fundas hoesjes j3 j5 j6 s20 s10 s9 s8 s7 s6 s5 plus edge b8283 12 angry men movie b0461 samsung galaxy note 20 case, coque iphone 8 anker 710pascher6582, custodia book flip anti polvere flessibile trasparente per iphone 5custodiasamsung5866, custodia per samsung galaxy tab a 10 1 2019 9custodia4cover11342 | No Comments »I completely did away with ‘referral codes’ this morning.
When we launched Nation of Neighbors back in June we wanted to ensure that we didn’t have spammers signing up and sending out reports with our broadcast system. While they never succeeded sending out a spam report on our previous site (Watch Jefferson County), that was only because we were hyper vigilant and limited to a small geographic area. https://www.alpesprobois.fr/products/coque-samsung-j3-bois-709pascher1821 fundas iphone 7 8 plus They tried all the time. https://www.aquawood.fr/products/coque-iphone-8-so-seven-715pascher5258 Ron literally had a full time volunteer job deleting spam. https://www.alpesprobois.fr/products/coque-samsung-galaxy-j5-2016-paillette-709pascher5639 Based on that experience, we built a number of spam control measures into Nation of Neighbors. One of those controls was the ‘referral code’ system.
Here’s how it worked: Rather than allowing prospective members to join immediately, prospective members instead requested a referral. fundas samsung galaxy note8 If the prospective member lived within the boundaries of an existing group, the request was shown to existing members who could choose to send the prospective member an invitation. bracelet homme When the prospective member lived in a new area, the invitation was issued by an admin. This barrier to entry was supposed to limit ‘false’ registrations and help community leaders control who got to see and share information in their community (you can still elect to approve all group members in your group’s settings). After all, you know who really lives in your community. We don’t. https://www.aquawood.fr/products/coque-iphone-7-minie-710pascher1670 coque iphone 8 In reality, our existing communities were already pretty well covered, so Ron and I ended up sending most of the invitations anyway.
Two months ago I changed our system over to ’self-invitation’. You entered your phone number or email address and received a code that you entered on the signup form. https://www.alpesprobois.fr/products/coque-iphone-8-disney-store-710pascher5569 I believe that’s still excessive and redundant – 50% of the potential members who requested a referral never returned to sign up. https://www.alpesprobois.fr/products/coque-iphone-11-cross-823iphone114269 Many of those potential members lived within existing community groups.
Why did we ever require referral codes? In my own words:
This small barrier to entry helps us maintain high quality membership and data. The referral system also helps us avoid ‘members’ who would sign up to post spam. https://www.alpesprobois.fr/products/coque-clapet-samsung-galaxy-a5-2016-709pascher10686 fundas huawei y6 2017 The referral system also helps ensure that we can limit growth to a manageable level and focus on growth at the local level when new community groups are added.
Spam has not been a problem (we currently have 10 times more traffic than Watch Jefferson did without a single spam message to delete) and we have had no problem controlling traffic or ‘growth’. In fact, I wish we had that problem. I should have known better.
To everyone who took the time to fill out the extra forms – please accept my apologies.
Leave a Reply